Insight

The hybrid paradox: Why traditional production struggles with plant based proteins

NIRAS On Protein, Hybrid Products, Engineering
Sally-Ann van Nuland

Sally-Ann van Nuland

Marketing and Communication

Across the food and beverage sector, manufacturers are exploring how to adapt existing processing systems, production logistics, and cleaning regimes to support a new generation of products: Hybrid products containing both animal and plant bases proteins.

May 15, 2026

Consumer attitudes towards protein are changing. More people are looking for products that support healthier lifestyles while also reducing environmental impact, but they are not necessarily looking to give up meat or dairy altogether. Instead, many are moving towards balanced or hybrid products that combine animal and plant based proteins within the same product.

For manufacturers, this creates a significant opportunity. Hybrid products allow producers to reduce reliance on animal proteins, lower environmental impact, and respond to changing consumer expectations without sacrificing taste, texture, or familiarity. The challenge is that developing these products is far more complex than simply replacing one ingredient with another.

Traditional production systems were never designed for hybrid proteins

Across the food and beverage sector, manufacturers are now exploring how to adapt existing processing systems, production logistics, and cleaning regimes to support this new generation of products. Many are trying to combine traditional manufacturing processes with newer plant based technologies within the same facility. It is an exciting shift for the industry, but it also introduces a completely different set of engineering and operational considerations.

Protein Report tank

Why hybrid proteins are becoming more popular

Hybrid products sit between traditional animal products and fully plant based alternatives. They appeal to flexitarian consumers who want healthier and more sustainable options but still value the taste, nutrition, and eating experience associated with meat and dairy products.

There is also increasing pressure on manufacturers to reduce the environmental footprint of production. Animal protein supply chains are becoming more volatile and expensive, while sustainability regulations continue to tighten. Hybrid products provide a practical way to reduce animal protein usage while maintaining product quality and consumer acceptance.

As a result, manufacturers are now focusing on how production environments can support this protein transition at scale.

Plant and animal proteins behave very differently

One of the biggest misconceptions in the protein transition is that protein is simply protein. From a processing and engineering perspective, that is not the case at all.

Animal proteins are generally easier to process. They are highly digestible, predictable in behaviour, and respond consistently during heating, mixing, and homogenisation. Dairy proteins, for example, have long been used in stable and repeatable production systems.

They often contain fibre, starches, fats, and plant cell structures that affect how they dissolve, hydrate, heat, and interact with other ingredients. Many plant proteins are also less digestible and require additional processing to achieve the same functionality or nutritional performance as animal proteins.

That difference becomes particularly important when both protein types are combined in a hybrid product. The result is not simply an average of the two. Hybrid systems create entirely new behaviours during production.

Products may thicken unexpectedly, separate during storage, clump during mixing, or react differently to heat treatment. Even the sequence in which ingredients are introduced into the process can affect the final product quality.

For example, plant proteins are often hydrated and heat treated separately before being combined with dairy ingredients. Without that pretreatment step, proteins can interfere with one another during stabilisation and create unwanted texture or consistency issues later in the process.

Download our whitepaper on alternative proteins

Remodelling and scaling manufacturing
to meet a new demand

Protein concentrate vs protein isolate

Another important distinction is the type of protein ingredient being used.

Protein concentrates typically contain around 70 to 80% protein, alongside fibre, carbohydrates, and fats. Because they retain more of the original raw material, they behave differently in production and often create additional viscosity or texture challenges.

Protein isolates are more refined and contain a much higher percentage of pure protein. They are generally easier to standardise within formulations and contain less fat and fewer carbohydrates, but the extraction method used to create the isolate has a direct impact on how the ingredient performs in processing.

Whether a protein has been extracted using acid or salt based methods, whether it arrives wet or dry, and whether it has already been texturised through extrusion all influence how it can be handled within production.

That affects everything from ingredient dosing and storage through to allergen management, cleaning strategies, and production planning.

The engineering challenge behind hybrid production

For manufacturers working with existing dairy, meat, or beverage facilities, hybrid production introduces a completely different process environment.

Pumps, pipework, homogenisers, heat exchangers, and CIP systems are often designed around the behaviour of traditional animal based products. Once plant based materials are introduced, those assumptions no longer hold true.

Plant protein powders can be difficult to dissolve and disperse consistently. Mixed protein systems may separate during processing, with heavier plant particles settling while fats rise to the surface. Standard dairy homogenisers are not always capable of breaking down plant structures sufficiently to achieve the desired texture and stability.

Temperature response is another challenge. Processes that previously worked perfectly for dairy or meat streams can create instability within hybrid formulations.

Cleaning and hygiene become more demanding too. Hybrid products are often stickier and leave more residue behind in tanks, pipework, and heat exchangers. Existing CIP protocols may no longer deliver adequate cleaning performance, even if they worked successfully for years with conventional products.

Manufacturers also need to think carefully about allergens, product segregation, and production flexibility. Dedicated lines can simplify this considerably, but many facilities are trying to balance multiple product types within shared environments.

Reach out:

Morten Aae Olander

Morten Aae Olander

Senior Market Director

Allerød, Denmark

+45 4038 0440

Jeroen van den Boezem

Jeroen van den Boezem

Senior Market Director

Rosmalen, Netherlands

+31646314509

Edmund Keenan

Edmund Keenan

Expertise Director

Burton upon Trent, United Kingdom

+44 (0) 7920 258 404

From challenge to opportunity

Hybrid protein production is not simply an ingredient challenge. It is a process, engineering, and operational challenge as well.

At NIRAS, we support food and beverage manufacturers throughout the full production journey, from early concept development and feasibility studies through to process design, utilities, production integration, and commissioning.

Our teams understand both traditional food manufacturing and the new processing demands created by hybrid proteins. That includes ingredient handling, hygienic design, CIP optimisation, process adaptation, utilities, and production logistics.

As the protein transition continues, manufacturers need facilities that can remain flexible while maintaining product quality, operational efficiency, and compliance. Hybrid products are creating new opportunities across the sector, but successful implementation depends on understanding how these ingredients behave inside real production environments.